Re: The Cycle***
In your(1) Facebook**, or post something^^ or other.*
*Lede or Ship(saved in draft)
**anacronyism/acronomiters(ditto) and tangents /[(Re:(fn)]
i.e. Heading lost in the process.
*** Bazinga!(c-aster risks)
[Pred-Haidt?]
[Post whatism is the key to the lost heading above.]
[Sea-#PO aka C-uncap-3PO: Ouch! That's the ticket! Speaking of rise/run: War is a last resort, and some people don't know a resort from a hole in the ground.]
The Cycle^ File ? *or*not*
[^ post "don't ask don't tell"(not to mention?[!])
^^ scroll over ]
Note Labels: Saved in Draft, Under Construction...ostensibly complete.
[Pregame Gut Check]
[Post Game Re-Cap: Tide Rolls.]
1-8-13 See what the gut gives us? (Tuesday Morning quarter-backing?) Our Lady of little faith, see "mistakes" crack, under Rolls. While the Crimson Tide rolled, it was certainly arising, with an un-named tune floating in my head.
(1) links inserted 1-8-13 Our
Story / Morning Joe?(2) / Post
"don't ask, don't tell"^ ?
(speaking of Up Swift Creak: Bane Or for Haggle?)
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Haidt. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Haidt. Sort by date Show all posts
Monday, January 07, 2013
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Out of the Blue?
Jet Blue Co-Pilot brings down plane. Reuters
Co-Pilot Consistent/calm CBS
Pilot Rant LA Times
[4-1-12: Not Exactly].
[Technical anomolies prevent the embedding of the above two links @Not Exactly. I will also that the links, contrary to may standard operating procedure, have been fully read.]
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Ghost of X-mas Passed.
The Dickens*** you say?
Or Heckuva Charlie horse race?
Two Mitt or Not Two R's or 4F's.
Republicans too* Lucy the politics of us.
*If Romney does one more speech** he will be a Democrat, we will just have to guess which one.
** Haidt of sarcasm and parody.
*** kNOT! For image sake only, it is easier to drink a heading than lede a congress to water.
(Avast ye mixed Presidents Re:Reimagined [!])
Or Heckuva Charlie horse race?
Two Mitt or Not Two R's or 4F's.
Republicans too* Lucy the politics of us.
*If Romney does one more speech** he will be a Democrat, we will just have to guess which one.
** Haidt of sarcasm and parody.
*** kNOT! For image sake only, it is easier to drink a heading than lede a congress to water.
(Avast ye mixed Presidents Re:Reimagined [!])
Wednesday, May 02, 2012
CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)
May Day ain't what it used to be.
Cads are what they will be.
CAD used to stand for Computer Aided Design.
Fore! To correct the swing of sorts.
I recently referred to Ted Nugent as having CAD, Cause Affect Deficiency or Disorder, along with Mitt Romney. And since it is all about the defining issues of our time, or the 2012 election, the ideal flip-flop from Cause Affect Disorder is Culturally Aided Design. If fact I feel that the Jonathan Haidt book, The Righteous Mind may be enlightening to read, but I believe it has some imbalances.
Why does he pick the categories he does to distinguish liberals from conservatives? Why is having them balanced better than in some hierarchy? Why should we look to the sacred, and wouldn't the rest follow of sorts? SEGUE
If moral psychology is the foundation for politics and religion, what is the foundation of economics? Or physics and philosophy?
Now I know I am avoiding comment on the May Day issues**, but in the greater scheme of things, there may be a related point to do so. While I have yet to get the book, I have perused more than once most of the links in the previous paragraph(pre-segue). Not that they may be inserted only slightly more than haphazardly. In my lede, I have hinted that to be a CAD is not always bad, but sometimes it is just*** a tool*.
*BTW: it was more than just for convenience that I used affect over effect.
** 5-2-12
***5-3-12 "CAD" and "just" links are not endorsements of confrontation without consequences. Violence and destruction must not be condoned. Anarchists should be seen as part of the 1%. (Hijacking the message, much as the Tea-party had their's hijacked by the Koch bothers.) I might add that globalization, capitalism and even cap and trade, are not the problems or solutions^. It is the entitlements of the 1% in their hyperbola of fantasy. The only difference between anarchists and libertarians is the fantasy. Not that anarchists are more real, at least they realize that their is something about the foundations over the fountainhead.
[5-4-12 On the globalization front.]
Cads are what they will be.
CAD used to stand for Computer Aided Design.
Fore! To correct the swing of sorts.
I recently referred to Ted Nugent as having CAD, Cause Affect Deficiency or Disorder, along with Mitt Romney. And since it is all about the defining issues of our time, or the 2012 election, the ideal flip-flop from Cause Affect Disorder is Culturally Aided Design. If fact I feel that the Jonathan Haidt book, The Righteous Mind may be enlightening to read, but I believe it has some imbalances.
Why does he pick the categories he does to distinguish liberals from conservatives? Why is having them balanced better than in some hierarchy? Why should we look to the sacred, and wouldn't the rest follow of sorts? SEGUE
If moral psychology is the foundation for politics and religion, what is the foundation of economics? Or physics and philosophy?
Now I know I am avoiding comment on the May Day issues**, but in the greater scheme of things, there may be a related point to do so. While I have yet to get the book, I have perused more than once most of the links in the previous paragraph(pre-segue). Not that they may be inserted only slightly more than haphazardly. In my lede, I have hinted that to be a CAD is not always bad, but sometimes it is just*** a tool*.
*BTW: it was more than just for convenience that I used affect over effect.
** 5-2-12
***5-3-12 "CAD" and "just" links are not endorsements of confrontation without consequences. Violence and destruction must not be condoned. Anarchists should be seen as part of the 1%. (Hijacking the message, much as the Tea-party had their's hijacked by the Koch bothers.) I might add that globalization, capitalism and even cap and trade, are not the problems or solutions^. It is the entitlements of the 1% in their hyperbola of fantasy. The only difference between anarchists and libertarians is the fantasy. Not that anarchists are more real, at least they realize that their is something about the foundations over the fountainhead.
[5-4-12 On the globalization front.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)